b75d8dc564
The Linux coding style guide (Documentation/process/coding-style.rst) clearly says: It's a **mistake** to use typedef for structures and pointers. Besides, using typedef for structures is annoying when you try to make headers self-contained. Let's say you have the following function declaration in a header: void foo(bd_t *bd); This is not self-contained since bd_t is not defined. To tell the compiler what 'bd_t' is, you need to include <asm/u-boot.h> #include <asm/u-boot.h> void foo(bd_t *bd); Then, the include direcective pulls in more bloat needlessly. If you use 'struct bd_info' instead, it is enough to put a forward declaration as follows: struct bd_info; void foo(struct bd_info *bd); Right, typedef'ing bd_t is a mistake. I used coccinelle to generate this commit. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: <smpl> @@ typedef bd_t; @@ -bd_t +struct bd_info </smpl> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
22 lines
426 B
C
22 lines
426 B
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
|
|
/*
|
|
* RMOBILE EtherMAC initialization.
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2012 Renesas Solutions Corp.
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2012 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <common.h>
|
|
#include <net.h>
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
#include <netdev.h>
|
|
|
|
int cpu_eth_init(struct bd_info *bis)
|
|
{
|
|
int ret = -ENODEV;
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SH_ETHER
|
|
ret = sh_eth_initialize(bis);
|
|
#endif
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|