From acc67744c0ed571c0ecaebef819bedbfca773a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Robert P. J. Day" Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 04:42:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete tip referring to 2010 removal of TAP numbers. Remove a tip describing the discouraged use of TAP numbers, and how these numbers would be removed by mid-2010. Change-Id: Iebe7e2e4a0f8e1f18a91d7935588dd9ced2b398d Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1862 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver --- doc/openocd.texi | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/openocd.texi b/doc/openocd.texi index 3781a3989..425e4393d 100644 --- a/doc/openocd.texi +++ b/doc/openocd.texi @@ -3726,17 +3726,6 @@ The components of a dotted name should follow ``C'' symbol name rules: start with an alphabetic character, then numbers and underscores are OK; while others (including dots!) are not. -@quotation Tip -In older code, JTAG TAPs were numbered from 0..N. -This feature is still present. -However its use is highly discouraged, and -should not be relied on; it will be removed by mid-2010. -Update all of your scripts to use TAP names rather than numbers, -by paying attention to the runtime warnings they trigger. -Using TAP numbers in target configuration scripts prevents -reusing those scripts on boards with multiple targets. -@end quotation - @section TAP Declaration Commands @c shouldn't this be(come) a {Config Command}?