zy1000: fix optimisation gaffe

DCC optimisation was broken on targets w/multiple TAP's.

Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
This commit is contained in:
Øyvind Harboe 2010-06-07 16:14:51 +02:00
parent f6236ade0e
commit c634680384

View File

@ -820,14 +820,35 @@ static void jtag_pre_post_bits(struct jtag_tap *tap, int *pre, int *post)
*post = post_bits;
}
/*
static const int embeddedice_num_bits[] = {32, 6};
uint32_t values[2];
values[0] = value;
values[1] = (1 << 5) | reg_addr;
jtag_add_dr_out(tap,
2,
embeddedice_num_bits,
values,
TAP_IDLE);
*/
void embeddedice_write_dcc(struct jtag_tap *tap, int reg_addr, uint8_t *buffer, int little, int count)
{
#if 0
int i;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
embeddedice_write_reg_inner(tap, reg_addr, fast_target_buffer_get_u32(buffer, little));
buffer += 4;
}
#else
int pre_bits;
int post_bits;
jtag_pre_post_bits(tap, &pre_bits, &post_bits);
if (pre_bits + post_bits + 6 > 32)
if ((pre_bits > 32) || (post_bits + 6 > 32))
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
@ -837,18 +858,20 @@ void embeddedice_write_dcc(struct jtag_tap *tap, int reg_addr, uint8_t *buffer,
}
} else
{
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_DRSHIFT, pre_bits, 0);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < count - 1; i++)
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
/* Fewer pokes means we get to use the FIFO more efficiently */
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_DRSHIFT, pre_bits, 0);
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_DRSHIFT, 32, fast_target_buffer_get_u32(buffer, little));
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_IDLE, 6 + post_bits + pre_bits, (reg_addr | (1 << 5)));
/* Danger! here we need to exit into the TAP_IDLE state to make
* DCC pick up this value.
*/
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_IDLE, 6 + post_bits, (reg_addr | (1 << 5)));
buffer += 4;
}
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_DRSHIFT, 32, fast_target_buffer_get_u32(buffer, little));
shiftValueInner(TAP_DRSHIFT, TAP_IDLE, 6 + post_bits, (reg_addr | (1 << 5)));
}
#endif
}