imi415
/
openocd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

The "arm9tdmi.c" file is more of a generic ARM9 support file: 

- update comments to say so.
 - update docs to clarify that the "arm9tdmi" command prefix
   is a misnomer.
 - bugfix some messages that wrongly assume only ARM9TDMI
   based processors use this code.


git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2719 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
This commit is contained in:
dbrownell 2009-09-17 08:02:43 +00:00
parent e18bd3b55e
commit cb7ad25c04
2 changed files with 26 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
doc/openocd.texi
View File

@ -4932,13 +4932,18 @@ Translate a virtual address @var{va} to a physical address
and display the result.
@end deffn
@subsection ARM9TDMI specific commands
@cindex ARM9TDMI
@subsection ARM9 specific commands
@cindex ARM9
Many ARM9-family CPUs are built around ARM9TDMI integer cores,
or processors resembling ARM9TDMI, and can use these commands.
ARM9-family cores are built around ARM9TDMI or ARM9E (including ARM9EJS)
integer processors.
Such cores include the ARM920T, ARM926EJ-S, and ARM966.
For historical reasons, one command shared by these cores starts
with the @command{arm9tdmi} prefix.
This is true even for ARM9E based processors, which implement the
ARMv5TE architecture instead of ARMv4T.
@c 9-june-2009: tried this on arm920t, it didn't work.
@c no-params always lists nothing caught, and that's how it acts.

20
src/target/arm9tdmi.c
View File

@ -31,6 +31,16 @@
#include "target_type.h"
/*
* NOTE: this holds code that's used with multiple ARM9 processors:
* - ARM9TDMI (ARMv4T) ... in ARM920, ARM922, and ARM940 cores
* - ARM9E-S (ARMv5TE) ... in ARM946, ARM966, and ARM968 cores
* - ARM9EJS (ARMv5TEJ) ... in ARM926 core
*
* In short, the file name is a misnomer ... it is NOT specific to
* that first generation ARM9 processor, or cores using it.
*/
#if 0
#define _DEBUG_INSTRUCTION_EXECUTION_
#endif
@ -967,8 +977,12 @@ int arm9tdmi_register_commands(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx)
command_t *arm9tdmi_cmd;
retval = arm7_9_register_commands(cmd_ctx);
arm9tdmi_cmd = register_command(cmd_ctx, NULL, "arm9tdmi", NULL, COMMAND_ANY, "arm9tdmi specific commands");
register_command(cmd_ctx, arm9tdmi_cmd, "vector_catch", handle_arm9tdmi_catch_vectors_command, COMMAND_EXEC, "catch arm920t vectors ['all'|'none'|'<vec1 vec2 ...>']");
arm9tdmi_cmd = register_command(cmd_ctx, NULL, "arm9tdmi",
NULL, COMMAND_ANY,
"arm9tdmi specific commands");
register_command(cmd_ctx, arm9tdmi_cmd, "vector_catch",
handle_arm9tdmi_catch_vectors_command, COMMAND_EXEC,
"catch arm9 vectors ['all'|'none'|'<vec1 vec2 ...>']");
return retval;
}
@ -985,7 +999,7 @@ int handle_arm9tdmi_catch_vectors_command(struct command_context_s *cmd_ctx, cha
if (arm9tdmi_get_arch_pointers(target, &armv4_5, &arm7_9, &arm9tdmi) != ERROR_OK)
{
command_print(cmd_ctx, "current target isn't an ARM9TDMI based target");
command_print(cmd_ctx, "current target isn't an ARM9 based target");
return ERROR_OK;
}