057e566097
Replace the FSF boilerplate with the SPDX tag. The SPDX tag on files *.c is incorrect, as it should use the C99 single line comment using '//'. But current checkpatch doesn't allow C99 comments, so keep using standard C comments, by now. Change-Id: I255ad17235ff1e01bf0aa4deed4d944e1d693ddb Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7071 Tested-by: jenkins
39 lines
1.7 KiB
C
39 lines
1.7 KiB
C
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
|
|
|
|
/***************************************************************************
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2005 by Dominic Rath *
|
|
* Dominic.Rath@gmx.de *
|
|
* *
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2008 by Spencer Oliver *
|
|
* spen@spen-soft.co.uk *
|
|
* *
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2009 by Øyvind Harboe *
|
|
* oyvind.harboe@zylin.com *
|
|
***************************************************************************/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef OPENOCD_TARGET_ARMV4_5_H
|
|
#define OPENOCD_TARGET_ARMV4_5_H
|
|
|
|
/* This stuff "knows" that its callers aren't talking
|
|
* to microcontroller profile (current Cortex-M) parts.
|
|
* We want to phase it out so core code can be shared.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* OBSOLETE, DO NOT USE IN NEW CODE! The "number" of an arm_mode is an
|
|
* index into the armv4_5_core_reg_map array. Its remaining users are
|
|
* remnants which could as easily walk * the register cache directly as
|
|
* use the expensive ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE() macro.
|
|
*/
|
|
int arm_mode_to_number(enum arm_mode mode);
|
|
enum arm_mode armv4_5_number_to_mode(int number);
|
|
|
|
extern const int armv4_5_core_reg_map[9][17];
|
|
|
|
#define ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE(cache, mode, num) \
|
|
(cache->reg_list[armv4_5_core_reg_map[arm_mode_to_number(mode)][num]])
|
|
|
|
/* offset into armv4_5 core register cache -- OBSOLETE, DO NOT USE! */
|
|
enum { ARMV4_5_CPSR = 31, };
|
|
|
|
#endif /* OPENOCD_TARGET_ARMV4_5_H */
|