Move most declarations in <target/armv4_5.h> to <target/arm.h>
and update users.
What's left in the older file is stuff that I think should be
removed ... the old register cache access stuff, which makes it
awkward to support microcontroller profile (Cortex-M) cores.
The armv4_5_run_algorithm() declaration was moved too, even
though it's not yet as generic as it probably ought to be.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Rename some (mostly) generic ARM functions:
armv4_5_arch_state() --> arm_arch_state()
armv4_5_get_gdb_reg_list() --> arm_get_gdb_reg_list()
armv4_5_init_arch_info() --> arm_init_arch_info()
Cores using the microcontroller profile may want a different
arch_state() routine though.
(Also fix strange indentation in arm_arch_state: use tabs only!
And update a call to it, removing assignment-in-conditional.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Move the ARM opcode macros from <target/armv4_5.h>, and a few
Thumb2 ones from <target/armv7m.h>, to more appropriate homes
in a new <target/arm_opcodes.h> file.
Removed duplicate opcodes from that v7m/Thumb2 set. Protected
a few macro argument references by adding missing parentheses.
Tightening up some of the line lengths turned up a curious artifact:
the macros for the Thumb opcodes are all 32 bits wide, not 16 bits.
There's currently no explanation for why it's done that way...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Get rid of mrc_opcode() in favor of ARMV4_5_MRC() or, where
arm*20t should have used it, ARMV4_5_MCR() instead.
Basically, *writing* coprocessor registers shouldn't have
used the *read* opcode ... and both should stick to standard
opcode constructors, not rearranging parameter sequence any
more than already needed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Remove an undesirable use of the CPSR symbol ... it needs to vanish.
Flag mode-to-number stuff as obsolete; say why ... should also vanish.
Get rid of no-longer-used mode and state typedefs.
Comment a few of the implicit ties to "classic ARM".
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Store a flag and errno in in "struct arm".
Have "poll" output report when semihosting is active.
Shrink some of the affected lines.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Changes from the flat namespace to heirarchical one. Instead of writing:
#include "target.h"
the following form should be used.
#include <target/target.h>
The exception is from .c files in the same directory.
Changes from the flat namespace to heirarchical one. Instead of writing:
#include "command.h"
the following form should be used.
#include <helper/command.h>
The exception is from .c files in the same directory.
Switch "mrc" and "mcr" commands to be toplevel ARM operations,
as they should initially have been.
Correct the usage message for both commands: it matches ARM
documentation (as one wants!) instead of reordering them to
match the funky mrc() and mcr() method usage (sigh).
For Cortex-A8: restore a line that got accidentally dropped,
so the secure monitor mode shadow registers will show again.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Uses chaining of command_registration structures to eliminate all
target_type register_callback routines. Exports the command_handler
registration arrays for those target types that are used by others.
First version of interface for sharing code between ARMv6 and ARMv7a
debug modules ... now the architecture includes debug support. (Not
the same as for the trimmed-down v7m or v6m though!) This is a first
version of an interface that will let the ARM11 and Cortex-A8 support
share code, features, and bugfixes. Based on existing code from both
of those cores.
The ARM v7-AR architecture specification calls this commonality the
"Debug Programmer's Model (DPM)", which seemed to be an appropriate
acronym -- a TLA even! -- for use in our code. Made it so. :)
The initial scope of this just supports register access, and is geared
towards supporting top level "struct arm" mechanisms. Later, things
like breakpoint and watchpoint support should be included.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Define arm_reg_current() ... returning handle to a given register,
and encapsulating the current mode's register shadowing. It's got
one current use, for reporting the current register set to GDB.
This will let later patches clean up much ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE()
nastiness, saving a bit of code.
Define and use arm_set_cpsr() ... initially it updates the cached
CPSR and sets up state used by arm_reg_current(), plus any SPSR
handle. (Later: can also set up for T and J bits.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Stash a pointer to the CPSR in the "struct arm", to help get rid
of the (common) references to its index in the register cache.
This removes almost all references to CPSR offsets outside of the
toplevel ARM code ... except a pair related to the current ARM11
"simulator" logic (which should be removable soonish).
This is a net minor code shrink of a few hundred bytes of object
code, and also makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Implementations need to access the register struct they modify;
make it easier and less error-prone to identify the instance.
(This removes over 10% of the ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE nastiness...)
Plus some minor fixes noted when making these updates: ARM7/ARM9
accessor methods should be static; don't leave CPSR wrongly marked
"dirty"; note significant XScale omissions in register handling;
and have armv4_5_build_reg_cache() record its result.
Rename "struct armv4_5_core_reg" as "struct arm_reg"; it's used
for more than those older architecture generations.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Create a generic register_cache_invalidate(), and use it to
replace three all-but-identical core-specific routines:
- armv4_5_invalidate_core_regs()
- armv7m_invalidate_core_regs
- mips32_invalidate_core_regs() too.
Make cache->num_regs be unsigned, avoiding various errors.
Net code shrink and simplification.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Just pre-allocate memory for the cached register value.
Shrinks heap overhead; increases locality-of-reference.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
We don't want an ARMv7-specific core state enumeration just to
add ThumbEE state. Update the generic stuff to handle that,
and replace the V7-specific bits with it.
For Cortex-A8: on debug entry, check both the T and J bits
instead of just the T bit. When the J bit is set, set the
right state and warn appropriately.
(And while we're at it, move the generic arm struct to the front
of the v7a structure, for somewhat better code generation.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Teach the "armv4_5" register code to understand about the
secure monitor mode:
- Add the other three shadowed registers to the arrays
- Support another internal mode number (sigh) in mappings
- Catch malloc/calloc failures building that register cache
This should kick in for Cortex-A8 and ARM1176.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
It's used to flag cores with the "TrustZone" extension,
and is used in subsequent patches to set up support for
the registers shadowed by its new secure monitor mode.
The ARM1176 and Cortex-A8 both support this new mode.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Add a new is_arm_mode() predicate, and use it to replace almost
all calls to current armv4_5_mode_to_number().
Eventually those internal mode numbers should vanish... along
with their siblings in the armv7a.c file.
Remove a handful of superfluous checks ... e.g. the mode number
was just initialized, or (debug entry methods) already validated.
Move one of the macros using internal mode numbers into the only
file which uses that macro. Make the tables manipulated with
those numbers be read-only and, where possible, static so they're
not confused with part of the generic ARM interface.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Add and use arm_mode_name() to map from PSR bits to user
meaningful names. It uses a new table which, later, can
be used to hold other mode-coupled data.
Add definitions for the "Secure Monitor" mode, as seen on
some ARM11 cores (like ARM1176) and on Cortex-A8. The
previous mode name scheme didn't understand that mode.
Remove the old mechanism ... there were two copies, caused
by Cortex-A8 needing to add "Secure Monitor" mode support.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
All ARM cores need to provide obsolete FPA registers in their
GDB register dumps. (Even though cores with floating point
support now generally use some version of VFP...)
Clean up that support a bit by sharing the same dummy registers,
and removing the duplicate copies. Eventually we shouldn't need
to export those dummies.
(This makes the ARMv7-M support include the armv4_5 header, and
cleans up related #includes, but doesn't yet use anything from
there except those dummies.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
They're really too big to inline, at least for code that's
not in any performance-critical loops.
Also move the associated string table to the rodata section.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Don't include it in more headers than necessary; just
use it in the few files that actually need it.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Same deal: "register.h" got needlessly included all over the
place because of being in a few widely included headers.
So take it out of the header files which included it, and put
it in files which use it ... reduce needless interdependencies.
Also, don't need that extra "types.h" inclusion.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Lots of files still include it, often through needless
duplicate inclusion of "log.h"; sigh.
This cleans up the inclusion graph a bunch, so there are
fewer inclusion paths, but it doesn't change much otherwise.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The arm7_9_checksum_memory() and arm7_9_blank_check_memory()
routines are not actually specific to the ARM7 and ARM9 core
generations ... they can work for any core which can run
algorithms using basic ARM (not Thumb) instructions.
Rename them; move the declarations to a more generic site;
likewise move the code (and tidy it a bit in the process).
NOTE: the blank_check() method falsely returned a success
status (0) on one error path, when the algorithm failed.
Fixed this bug.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Spencer Oliver
David Brownell
Zachary T Welch